Iraq–Kuwait Maritime Dispute Resurfaces as Gulf States Back Kuwait
Tensions in the Gulf are rising again after Iraq submitted new maritime boundary coordinates to the United Nations, prompting strong objections from Kuwait and public support for Kuwait from several Gulf countries.
The disagreement centers on how sea borders between Iraq and Kuwait are defined — a sensitive issue that dates back decades and remains tied to trade access, national sovereignty, and regional stability.
What Triggered the Dispute
Iraq recently sent updated maps to the UN outlining what it considers its maritime boundaries. Kuwaiti officials quickly rejected the submission, saying the proposed coordinates overlap with areas that are already internationally recognized as Kuwaiti waters.
Kuwait argues that the matter was settled through previous agreements and UN decisions following the 1990 Iraqi invasion. From Kuwait’s perspective, reopening the issue risks undermining established international rulings.
Iraq, however, maintains that its submission follows maritime law principles and reflects what it believes is a fair interpretation of coastal geography.
Why the Sea Border Matters
At the center of the dispute is the Khor Abdullah waterway, a narrow but vital channel that serves as Iraq’s main maritime access to the Persian Gulf.
For Iraq, the channel is essential for trade, shipping, and the development of its ports, including projects meant to strengthen its economy and global trade connections.
For Kuwait, control of surrounding waters is tied to national sovereignty, security, and long-standing international agreements. Any perceived shift in maritime borders raises concerns about future territorial claims and regional stability.
Gulf Countries Rally Behind Kuwait
Several members of the Gulf Cooperation Council — including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman — issued statements supporting Kuwait’s position. They emphasized the importance of respecting international law and maintaining the existing border framework.
Their response signals that the issue is not just a bilateral disagreement, but one with broader regional implications.
What Happens Next
For now, the dispute remains diplomatic rather than military. Experts expect the issue to be handled through legal channels, negotiations, or international arbitration rather than escalation.
Still, the situation highlights how unresolved border questions from the past can continue to shape present-day politics in the Gulf.
Even decades after the Gulf War, the lines drawn on maps continue to influence trade routes, diplomacy, and national security in the region.
